Ozgur Oyman

  1. Are you or have you been an MPEG member?
    I am an MPEG member and have actively participated MPEG standardization activities during 2012-2016.
  2. What do you think makes MPEG special?
    MPEG has great reputation for its media standards, particularly on codecs and streaming formats/protocols. MPEG standards such as H.264/AVC and DASH have been such great success with broad industry adoption.
  3. What do you think is the most important MPEG impact?
    I’d say media codecs (e.g., H.264/AVC) for compression and media formats/protocols (e.g., DASH) for streaming/storage have made the biggest industry impact in terms of adoption and deployment.
  4. Do you think MPEG is a good conduit for research?
    Yes, particularly on the applied research side. MPEG participation can be very useful for media compression / systems researchers to drive the industry acceptance of their ideas through adoption in MPEG standards.
  5. Can you comment on your MPEG experience?
    In overall, I had great experience at MPEG and contributed as editor of several specifications and amendments. I had to discontinue my participation since 2016 due to the need to focus on 3GPP/5G standardization, but I still closely follow MPEG’s work.
  6. Are you satisfied with MPEG standards?
    Yes, particularly those ones that have been adopted by the industry and deployed broadly, i.e., in the codecs and systems areas.
  7. Do you think MPEG standards are the right choice?
    Hard to give a yes/no answer on this, since I believe what standard is the right choice should be addressed on a case-by-case basis depending on the particular market segment as well as other factors.
  8. What do you expect from MPEG in the future?
    Continue to deliver world class media standards to address the future interoperability needs of the industry.

Leave a Reply